CBAP v3 Elicitation Practice Exam 2025 – All-in-One Mastery Guide for Exam Success!

Using surveys for elicitation presents the drawback of potentially lacking in-depth insights due to their structured nature. Surveys are typically designed with specific questions that guide respondents toward particular answers, which can result in a more superficial understanding of the participants' thoughts, feelings, and motivations. This structure limits the ability to explore complex issues in great detail or to capture the nuances of respondents' experiences and opinions.

In contrast to more qualitative methods such as interviews or focus groups, which allow for open-ended exploration and follow-up questions, surveys often miss out on deeper insights that can emerge from unstructured dialogue. Respondents may have valuable information that doesn't fit neatly into the predetermined response options, leading to a loss of rich, qualitative data that could be essential for accurate understanding and analysis in the context of business requirements and needs.

This characteristic of surveys makes them less effective when the goal is to gain comprehensive, nuanced insights into participants' perspectives, preferences, or the context of their responses.